May 4, 2010

IRS Tax Audit - No Good Deed Goes Unpunished: California Tax Attorney

California Tax Attorney:

Here is a quick summary of a recent US TAX COURT case against the Internal Revenue Service to challenge the taxpayer’s right to deduct donations to a Catholic Church. The case involves a married couple who got audited by the Internal Revenue Service concerning donations they deducted on their Internal Revenue Service Form 1040 tax return.

Anonymous U.S. Tax Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF Internal Revenue Service
Docket No. 6851-08. Filed May 2010.


Tax Problem
Can an American taxpayer deduct as charitable contributions of $25,050 in wire transfers to his wife’s relative who distributed the money for the benefit of the Catholic Church of a foreign country on their Internal Revenue Service Form 1040?

Can a taxpayer deduct the airfare expense incurred while rendering services for a Catholic church in a foreign country on their Internal Revenue Service Form 1040?

APPLICABLE TAX CODE SECTION

Internal Revenue Code §170 allows taxpayers to claim a deduction for a charitable contribution if the contribution is made to or for the use of a qualified organization.

Internal Revenue Code §170 (c)(2) identifies an eligible recipient of a charitable deduction as “a corporation, trust, or community chest, fund, or foundation created or organized in the United States or under the law of the United States”.

irs%20tax%20audit%20business%20tax%20audt%20tax%20audit%20attorney%20irs%20tax%20settlement%20irs%20tax%20penalty%20irs%20tax%20interest%20tax%20help%20redondo%20beach%20tax%20attorney.jpg

CAN YOU DEDUCT DONATIONS MADE TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS IN A FOREIGN COUNTRY?

Taxpayers claimed the charitable contribution deductions on their joint IRS Form 1040 Income Tax Return. Taxpayers also claimed a charitable contribution deduction for the airplane ticket taxpayer wife purchased to travel to her native country and provide services to Catholic churches of that foreign country. The IRS issued a notice of deficiency disallowing certain charitable contribution deductions. Most of the disallowed deductions originated from taxpayer wife’s donations and charity work for the benefit of Catholic churches in a foreign country. Taxpayers filed a tax court petition appealing the report issued by the IRS Audit with the US Tax Court .

Taxpayer’s wife was born in a foreign country. Her parents were devout Catholics. Her father served as an officer in that country’s army during the conflict with the guerilla forces. Taxpayer wife was a young girl when the guerrilla forces initiated a military campaign. Taxpayer wife’s uncle was a Catholic priest in her hometown. When the guerrilla forces seized her hometown, taxpayer wife witnessed over 400 of her fellow Catholics, including her uncle and other citizens of her hometown, being buried alive. The guerrilla forces destroyed much of her hometown, including the Catholic Church. The foreign country’s government eventually fell. Taxpayer wife and her family later escaped from their country to the United States. Taxpayer wife later married U.S. taxpayer. She is a member of a church that belongs to the local Catholic diocese near her home in Texas.

Taxpayer’s wife completed her college education and was hired as an engineer at an international corporation. After completing college she returned to her native country and witnessed extreme poverty. Her experience motivated her to contribute money and services to help rebuild Catholic churches in that country. These Catholic churches provide food, education, and shelter to the poor. During one of her trips to her native country, the local police detained and interrogated taxpayer’s wife about her activities in her hometown.. The police also informed taxpayer’s wife that they had been monitoring her whereabouts in the country and were aware of her family’s support for the former government.

Fearing for her life, taxpayer’s wife devised a plan to disguise her contributions to Catholic churches in her native country. She would wire the money to the personal bank account of her mother’s cousin (cousin) who lived in taxpayer wife’s original hometown. The cousin then transferred the money to selected Catholic churches in that country.

UNITED STATES TAX COURT DID NOT ALLOW TAXPAYERS TO DEDUCT DONATIONS TO A FOREIGN CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION
Taxpayers argue that the ultimate beneficiary of the wire transfers was the Roman Catholic Church, a qualified donee under Internal Revenue Code §170(c)(2), and that taxpayer wife thus made the wire transfers to or for the use of a qualified organization.

Taxpayers claim that the Catholic Church is a universal organization, and therefore Catholic churches in taxpayer wife’s native country are qualified as donees under Internal Revenue Code §170. The Tax Court found no basis as to if the Catholic churches in that foreign country to which taxpayer wife’s wire transfers were distributed were created or organized in the United States or under the laws of the United States in compliance with Internal Revenue Code . The language of Internal Revenue Code §170(c)(2) is explicit, and the Tax Court must follow such plain language.

Regarding the airfare expense deducted on the IRS Form 1040 Income Tax Return for Individuals , taxpayers assert that the unreimbursed expenditure incident to taxpayer wife’s services should be deductible under Internal Revenue Code §170 because petitioner wife worked on behalf of several qualified organizations.

Nonetheless, taxpayers have failed to show that any of the Catholic churches in the foreign country to which taxpayer wife’s rendered services is a qualified organization within the meaning of Internal Revenue Code § 170(c)(2). Taxpayer wife did not render services in the foreign country under the direction of, or to or for the use of her local church or the local diocese. The record shows only that her priest at her local church had some awareness of her work in her native country. Nor is there any evidence that petitioner wife provided those services.

US Tax Court found taxpayer wife’s testimony to be sincere. However, taxpayers have failed to prove that they contributed to a qualified organization under Internal Revenue Code §170 . Tax Court has held in favor of the Internal Revenue Service .

Bookmark and Share

April 17, 2010

Tax Problem: Didn't Pay Your Taxes? Neither Did Pamela Anderson - California Franchise Tax Board(FTB) Releases List of Taxpayers Who Owe Taxes - Los Angeles California Tax Attorney

Los Angeles Tax Attorney:

California Income Tax - Franchise Tax Board FTB released

its annual list of top 250 California taxayers who haven't paid their taxes.

Tax Debt - Top 250 Honor Roll List

Highest Unpaid Tax Debt: $13,120,479
Lowest Unpaid Tax Debt: $ 290,964
tax%20attorney%20help%20with%20back%20taxes%20irs%20tax%20settlement%20offer%20in%20compromise%20irs%20tax%20attorney%20pamela%20anderson%20owes%20tax%20to%20FTB.jpg
Notable Celebrity:
Pamela Anderson (Website:http://pamelaanderson.com/)
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Income tax due - $ 493,144.68 - 04/07/2009

According to the Franchise Tax Board FTB ,

Vast majority of individual and business taxpayers file their return and pay their lawful tax liability. Those who fail to pay the taxes they lawfully owe contribute to the tax gap. The tax gap is the difference between what taxpayers owe and what they voluntarily pay. As a result, an increased tax burden is passed on to those who pay what they owe. Closing the tax gap is in the best interest of all Californians.

FTB tries to collect taxes through tax liens, tax levy and wage garnishment. As part of the collection process, FTB annually publish the Delinquent Taxpayers list on their website Franchise Tax Board FTB to "encourage" tax payment compliance.

The FTB list shows the top 250 individual and business taxpayers with state income tax liens where the total balance owed is greater than $100,000. In most instances, taxpayers who owe to the FTB also owe even larger tax debt to Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Many of these taxpayers could benefit from either a Tax Bankruptcy or Offer in Compromise to resolve their tax situation.


tax%20problem%20irs%20ftb%20sales%20tax%20audit%20in%20california%20Pamela%20Anderson%20tax%20debt%20need%20help%20with%20tax%20settlement.JPG

Bookmark and Share

June 14, 2009

Los Angeles Lakers 2009 World Champions

Los Angeles Tax Attorney:


Congratulations Los Angeles Lakers #15

los%20angeles%20tax%20attorney%20lakers%20win.jpg

Los Angeles Lakers 2009 World Champions Game Highlights

Bookmark and Share

August 10, 2008

LOS ANGELES IRS TAX AUDIT GUIDELINE FOR BUSINESS AUTO EXPENSE

Los Angeles Tax Attorney Internal Revenue Service IRS TAX today announced an increase in the optional standard mileage rates for the final six months of 2008. Taxpayers may use the optional standard rates to calculate the deductible costs of operating an automobile for business, charitable, medical or moving purposes.

The rate will increase to 58.5 cents a mile for all business miles driven from July 1, 2008, through Dec. 31, 2008. This is an increase of eight (8) cents from the 50.5 cent rate in effect for the first six months of 2008, as set forth in Internal Revenue Procedure 2007-70. IRS TAX AUDIT - Auto Expense Miles

IRS%20TAX%20AUDIT%20ATTORNEY%20CALIFORNIA.jpg

In recognition of recent gasoline price increases, the IRS made this special adjustment for the final months of 2008. The IRS normally updates the mileage rates once a year in the fall for the next calendar year.

"Rising gas prices are having a major impact on individual Americans. Given the increase in prices, the IRS is adjusting the standard mileage rates to better reflect the real cost of operating an automobile," said IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman. "We want the reimbursement rate to be fair to taxpayers."


While gasoline is a significant factor in the mileage figure, other items enter into the calculation of mileage rates, such as depreciation and insurance and other fixed and variable costs.

The optional business standard mileage rate is used to compute the deductible costs of operating an automobile for business use in lieu of tracking actual costs. This rate is also used as a benchmark by the federal government and many businesses to reimburse their employees for mileage.

The new six-month rate for computing deductible medical or moving expenses will also increase by eight (8) cents to 27 cents a mile, up from 19 cents for the first six months of 2008. The rate for providing services for charitable organizations is set by statute, not the IRS, and remains at 14 cents a mile.

IRS%20TAX%20AUDIT%20ATTORNEY%20NEW%20AUTO%20EXPENSE.jpgThe new rates are contained in Announcement 2008-63 on the optional standard mileage rates.

Taxpayers always have the option of calculating the actual costs of using their vehicle rather than using the standard mileage rates. IRS Mileage Expense for Tax Audit

Bookmark and Share

March 4, 2008

IRS Offer in Compromise - Resolve Tax Problem - Los Angeles, Long Beach California Tax Attorney

Many Los Angeles, Long Beach, Orange, Riverside, San Jose area business owners and taxpayers who have IRS tax problems may not have been aware of the tax settlement program called offer in compromise. Tax attorneys who handle these type of cases should prepare a comprehensive tax and financial analysis in order to prepare the most favorable tax settlement proposal which would result in minimum tax debt being paid to the IRS.

Although the IRS discourages and may create obstacles to have your IRS taxes reduced, a good tax attorney will often be able to prepare legal arguments that would contest and challenges put forth by the IRS concerning the tax settlement proposal.

An IRS Offer in Compromise allows taxpayers to settle their tax liabilities for less than the full amount. The objective of the IRS Offer in Compromise program is to accept a compromise when it is in the best interests of both the taxpayer and the government and promotes voluntary compliance with all future payment and filing requirements.

Major Changes to the IRS Offer in Compromise Program

The Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 (TIPRA), created major changes to the IRS IRS Offer in Compromise program as it relates to lump sum offers, periodic payment offers, and a determination as to when an offer is accepted. These changes affect all offers received by the IRS on or after July 16, 2006.

Continue reading "IRS Offer in Compromise - Resolve Tax Problem - Los Angeles, Long Beach California Tax Attorney" »

Bookmark and Share

March 3, 2008

IRS Offer in Compromise - Tax Settlement Los Angeles Tax Attorney

Los Angeles, California Tax Attorney - Most common questions asked by our Los Angeles, Orange County, Riverside and San Francisco area tax payers regarding IRS Tax Settlement - Offer in Compromise to resolve IRS tax problem.

1. What is the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act ?

The Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 was signed into tax law on May 17, 2006. Section 509 of this law creates significant changes to the IRS Offer in Compromise (OIC) program by amending Internal Revenue Service Code 7122.

2. When did the IRS Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act law go into effect?

The law went into effect for all offers that are submitted to the IRS on or after July 16, 2006.

3. How did IRS Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act , Section 509, impact the OIC program?

IRS Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act , Section 509, amends Internal Revenue Service Code 7122 by creating a new subsection (c), titled “Rules for Submission of Offers in Compromise.” The new subsection (c) requires that offers submitted on or after July 16, 2006, (and not subject to the waiver with respect to low-income taxpayers or offers filed under doubt as to liability only) must be accompanied by partial payments of the proposed offer amount. The form of these partial payments depends on the taxpayer’s proposed offer and terms of payment. The law also establishes a time period after which an offer would be deemed accepted by the IRS.



Continue reading "IRS Offer in Compromise - Tax Settlement Los Angeles Tax Attorney" »

Bookmark and Share

February 15, 2008

Los Angeles Taxpayer - IRS Denies Offer in Compromise for Tax Settlement

IRS Tax Court Denies IRS Offer in Compromise

Bookmark and Share