Posted On: August 23, 2008

California Board of Equalization BOE Sales Tax Audit of Mobile Phone Business - Sales Tax Problem

Californa Sales Tax - Board of Equalization Tax Attorney

California Board of Equalization California Sales Tax

California Board of Equalization has focused on sales tax audit of independent mobile phone vendors. Cell phone vendors must charge for sales tax on the full sales price of a cell phone when purchased at a discounted price, even when the phone offered for free. The application of the full sales tax is the same for pagers and other wireless telecommunication devices sold through a "bundled transaction."

california%20sales%20tax%20small%20business.jpg

When will sales tax be charged on the full sales price?

If you sell a cell phone at a discount and also require the end consumer to purchase a service contract, sales tax on the full sales price of the phone, not the discounted price, must be collected from the buyer. Even if the phone is sold for free, tax on what the phone’s sales price would have been without the service contract must be collected.


California Sales Tax Audit Determination

When the sale of a phone is made together with a required service contract, it is called a “bundled” transaction. If a phone is sold by itself, the sale is called an “unbundled” transaction.

Bundled transaction
Most cell phones are sold at a discounted sales price, or given away at no cost. However, in order to receive the discount or free cell phone, the customer is required to purchase a service contract of greater than one month (typically one or two years) with a particular service provider. California Board of Equalization Sales Tax Regulation 1585, Cellular Telephones, Pagers, and Other Wireless Telecommunication Devices, describes these types of sales as bundled transactions.

Unbundled transaction
A retailer may sell a cell phone without the requirement that a customer purchase a service contract. These sales are unbundled transactions and the actual sales price charged by the retailer to the customer is referred to in Regulation 1585 as the “unbundled sales price.”

How tax applies
When the sale is a bundled transaction, the retailer must report and pay tax based on the unbundled sales price of the cell phone whether or not the price of the phone is itemized on the invoice. The retailer is allowed to collect tax from the customer based on the unbundled sales price, and then pay that amount to the state. The unbundled sales price is either
• The sales price the retailer typically charges for the cell phone without requiring the purchase of a service contract, or
• The fair retail selling price (if the above cannot be established by the seller’s records).

Example
Excellent Cell Phones advertises a cell phone for $29.99 but requires you to activate the phone with a specific service provider for a two-year contract period. The retailer typically sells this phone for $179.99 without a service contract. The retailer is responsible for reporting and paying sales tax based on the unbundled sales price of $179.99 (tax of $14.85 assuming an 8.25 % tax rate). Even if Excellent Cell Phones offers the same cell phone for free, the tax would be the same, $14.85, as it is based on the $179.99 unbundled sales price. When the sale is an unbundled transaction, the retailer must report and pay tax based on the actual sales price charged to the customer.

Are fees for activating the cell phone taxable?
Fees for one-time activation and charges for wireless service are generally not taxable.

Posted On: August 22, 2008

IRS TAX AUDIT GUIDE FOR TAX ATTORNEYS - IRS ISSUES TAX AND PAYROLL TAX AUDIT GUIDE BASED ON BUSINESS INDUSTRY

Los Angeles Tax Attorney

Internal Revenue Service IRS TAX has various guidelines for tax lawyers which identifies issues and common tax problems which may arise during IRS tax or payroll tax audit involving various businesses. IRS Tax Examiners often rely on these tax guides to conduct their audits. Tax attorneys may challenge their client's tax audit results through the United States Tax Court US TAX COURT and may cite or reference any deviations from the various business audit tax guides.


The following businesses are commonly audited have industry based IRS tax audit guides which are used by the IRS auditors.

IRS Tax Audit Guide - Businesses Most Commonly Audited by Internal Revenue Service


Accuracy - Related Penalties For Taxpayers Involved In Tax Shelter Transactions
Alaskan Commercial Fishing: Catcher Vessels Part One
Alaskan Commercial Fishing:Processors and Brokers Part Two
Alternative Minimum Tax - For Individuals
Architects
Artists And Art Galleries
Auto Body and Repair Industry
Auto Dealerships Audit Technique Guide
Aviation Tax
Bail Bond Industry
Bars and Restaurants
Beauty and Barber Shops
Bed and Breakfasts
Business Consultants irs%20tax%20audit%20california%20tax%20attorney%20resolve%20irs%20tax%20problem.jpg
Car Wash Industry
Carpentry/Framing
Child Care Providers
Coal Excise Tax
Commercial Banking
Commercial Printing
Computers, Electronics, & High Tech Industry
Construction Industry
Drywallers
Entertainment - Important 1040 Issues
Farmers Audit Technique Guide
Farming - Specific Income Issues and Farm Cooperatives
Furniture Manufacturing
Garden Supplies
Garment Contractor
Garment Manufacturers
Gas Retailers
General Livestock
Grain Farmers
Hardwood Timber Industry
Independent Used Car Dealers
Farm Hobby Losses with Cattle Operations and Horse Activities
The Laundromat Industry
Lawsuits Awards and Settlements
Low-Income Housing Credit
Manufacturing Industry
Masonry And Concrete Industry
Ministers
Mobile Food Vendors
Mortuaries
Music Industry Handbook
Oil And Gas Industry
Partnerships Audit - Technique Guide
Passive Activity Losses
Pizza Restaurants
Placer Mining Industry
The Port Project
Poultry Industry
Reforestation Industry
Rehabilitation Tax Credit
Retail Gift Shops
Retail Industry Audit Technique Guide
Retail Liquor Industry
Scrap Metal Industry
Shareholder Loans
Sports Franchises
Swine Farm Industry
Taxicab Industry
Tobacco Industry
Tour Bus Industry
Trucking Industry
Veterinary Medicine
The Wine Industry

Posted On: August 20, 2008

US Tax Court Problem - California Tax Attorney: Fake Tax Court Petition Used for Tax Based Fraud

US Tax Court - Tax Attorney

Internal Revenue Service IRS TAX and United States Tax Court US TAX COURT released information regarding tax fraud related scams using the name of the IRS and US Tax Court.

Tax Court Scam

In this scam, an e-mail that appears to come from the U.S. Tax Court contains a petition involving a court case between the IRS and the recipient. The document instructs the recipient to download other files. The downloads transfer malware, or malicious code, to the recipient’s computer.

There are various types of malware, which, for example, can hijack a victim’s computer hard drive to give someone remote access to the computer, or can search for passwords and other information and send them to the scammer.

The truth is that the Tax Court is not e-mailing notices to anyone who currently has a case before the court. Visit the court’s Web site at http://www.ustaxcourt.gov/ for more information. Recipients are advised to avoid clicking on any links in the e-mail and to delete the e-mail.

tax%20attorney%20payroll%20tax%20tax%20problems%20tax%20audit%20offer%20in%20compromise%20criminal%20tax.jpg

How Scams Work

To lure their victims, phishing scams use the name of a known institution, such as the IRS, to either offer a reward for taking a simple action, such as providing information, or threaten or imply an unpleasant consequence, such as losing a refund, for failing to take the requested action.

The goal of the scams is to trick people into revealing personal and financial information, such as Social Security, bank account or credit card numbers, which the scammers can use to commit identity theft.

Typically, identity thieves use a victim’s personal and financial data to empty the victim’s financial accounts, run up charges on the victim’s existing credit cards, apply for new loans, credit cards, services or benefits in the victim’s name, file fraudulent tax returns or even commit crimes. Most of these fraudulent activities can be committed electronically from a remote location, including overseas. Committing these activities in cyberspace allows scammers to act quickly and cover their tracks before the victim becomes aware of the theft.

People whose identities have been stolen can spend months or years — and their hard-earned money — cleaning up the mess thieves have made of their reputations and credit records. In the meantime, victims may lose job opportunities or may be refused loans, education, housing or cars.

What to Do

Anyone wishing to access the IRS Web site should type www.irs.gov into their Internet address window, rather than clicking on a link in an e-mail or opening an attachment, either of which may download malicious code or send the recipient to a phony Web site.

Those who have received a questionable e-mail claiming to come from the IRS may forward it to the following address: phishing@irs.gov. Use the instructions contained in an article on this Web site titled “Protect Yourself from Suspicious E-Mails or Phishing Schemes.” Following the instructions will help the IRS track the suspicious e-mail to its origins and shut down the scam. Find the article by entering the words “suspicious e-mails” into the search box in the upper right corner of the page.

Those who have received a questionable telephone call that claims to come from the IRS may also use the phishing@irs.gov mailbox to notify the IRS.

The IRS has issued previous warnings on scams that use the IRS name to lend the scam legitimacy. More information on identity theft, phishing and telephone scams using the IRS name, logo or spoofed (copied) Web site is available this Web site. Enter the terms “phishing,” “identity theft” or “e-mail scams” into the search box in the upper right corner of the page.

Posted On: August 19, 2008

IRS Tax Problem - Payroll Tax and Business Tax Based Fraud

Business Tax Attorney

Internal Revenue Service IRS TAX and United States Tax Court US TAX COURT released information regarding tax fraud related scams using the name of the IRS and US Tax Court.

Business and Payroll Tax Scam

This e-mail appears to come from an IRS.gov e-mail address, addresses recipients by name and references the company the recipient works for. These personalized details may convince the recipient that the e-mail is legitimate. The e-mail says that the IRS has a report on the company and asks the recipient to review a copy by clicking on a link to download the report. However, when the link is clicked, malware is downloaded to the recipient’s computer.

There are various types of malware, which can hijack a victim’s computer hard drive to give someone remote access to the computer, search for passwords and other information and send them to the scammer, or cause other types of identity theft or damage.

The IRS does not compile reports on companies or send e-mails to company staff asking them to review a report. Generally, the IRS does not send unsolicited e-mails to taxpayers.

tax%20attorney%20payroll%20tax%20tax%20problems%20tax%20audit%20offer%20in%20compromise%20criminal%20tax.jpg


“Taxpayers should take steps to keep their personal information out of the hands of identity thieves,” said IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman. “That includes not falling for any of the phony e-mails or faxes now in circulation pretending to come from the IRS.”

Although most of these scams consist of e-mails requesting detailed personal information, the IRS generally does not send e-mails to taxpayers, does not discuss tax account matters with taxpayers in e-mails, and does not request security-related personal information, such as PIN numbers, from taxpayers.

Posted On: August 18, 2008

California Tax Attorney: IRS Tax Fraud Problem - Form 1040 Used for Tax Fraud

California Tax Attorney

Internal Revenue Service IRS TAX and United States Tax Court US TAX COURT released information regarding tax fraud related scams using the name of the IRS and US Tax Court.

IRS Tax Form 1040 Scam

This scam consists of a cover letter and form that are faxed, rather than e-mailed. The cover letter is addressed “Dear Valued Tax Payer (sic)” and appears to be signed by an IRS employee. The letter says that the IRS is updating its files and that recipients who supply the requested information will receive a nominal tax refund. It also states that those who fail to immediately return the completed form risk additional tax and withholding. The attached form is labeled a substitute Form 1040 and is titled “Certificate of Current Status of Beneficial Owner For United States Tax Recertification & Withholding.” It requests a large amount of detailed personal and financial information, such as mother’s maiden name (often used in security screening), bank account numbers, estimated assets and more. It asks the recipient to sign and fax back the completed form, as well as a copy of the recipient’s driver’s license and passport.

The letter, signature and form are all fraudulent. Moreover, the IRS does not send unsolicited faxes to taxpayers and does not request such detailed personal and financial information.

This is a variant of earlier scams. For more information, see news releases IR-2004-104 and IR-2004-75.

tax%20attorney%20payroll%20tax%20tax%20problems%20tax%20audit%20offer%20in%20compromise%20criminal%20tax.jpg


“Taxpayers should take steps to keep their personal information out of the hands of identity thieves,” said IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman. “That includes not falling for any of the phony e-mails or faxes now in circulation pretending to come from the IRS.”

Although most of these scams consist of e-mails requesting detailed personal information, the IRS generally does not send e-mails to taxpayers, does not discuss tax account matters with taxpayers in e-mails, and does not request security-related personal information, such as PIN numbers, from taxpayers.


Posted On: August 17, 2008

IRS Tax Problem - Los Angeles Tax Attorney:IRS Tax Payment Fraud Creates IRS Tax Problem

California Tax Attorney

Internal Revenue Service IRS TAX and United States Tax Court US TAX COURT released information regarding tax fraud related scams using the name of the IRS and US Tax Court.

Economic Stimulus Payments Scam

In this scam, a taxpayer receives an e-mail pretending to come from the IRS which tells the recipient he or she is eligible for an economic stimulus payment. The message recommends direct deposit into the taxpayer’s checking or savings account. To receive the payment, recipients must click on a link to complete and submit an online form by a certain date; otherwise, the e-mail warns, payment may be delayed. The form requests personal and financial data, including checking or savings account numbers that the scammers can use to gain access to the accounts.

In reality, the way members of the public receive their economic stimulus payment is to file a tax return with the IRS, not a special form. Additionally, the IRS does not request personal or financial information via e-mail.

Information on how to obtain an economic stimulus payment may be found in the Economic Stimulus Payments Information Center on the this Web site. For more information on stimulus-related scams, see IR-2008-11.


tax%20attorney%20payroll%20tax%20tax%20problems%20tax%20audit%20offer%20in%20compromise%20criminal%20tax.jpg


“Taxpayers should take steps to keep their personal information out of the hands of identity thieves,” said IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman. “That includes not falling for any of the phony e-mails or faxes now in circulation pretending to come from the IRS.”

Although most of these scams consist of e-mails requesting detailed personal information, the IRS generally does not send e-mails to taxpayers, does not discuss tax account matters with taxpayers in e-mails, and does not request security-related personal information, such as PIN numbers, from taxpayers.

Posted On: August 16, 2008

Los Angleles Tax Problem Attorney - IRS Tax Refund Fraud Targets California IRS Taxpayers

IRS Tax Lawyer

Internal Revenue Service IRS TAX and United States Tax Court US TAX COURT released information regarding tax fraud related scams using the name of the IRS and US Tax Court.

“Taxpayers should take steps to keep their personal information out of the hands of identity thieves,” said IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman. “That includes not falling for any of the phony e-mails or faxes now in circulation pretending to come from the IRS.”

Although most of these scams consist of e-mails requesting detailed personal information, the IRS generally does not send e-mails to taxpayers, does not discuss tax account matters with taxpayers in e-mails, and does not request security-related personal information, such as PIN numbers, from taxpayers.


tax%20attorney%20payroll%20tax%20tax%20problems%20tax%20audit%20offer%20in%20compromise%20criminal%20tax.jpg

Refund e-Mail Scam

There are several variations of the refund scam, in which an e-mail claiming to come from the IRS falsely informs the recipient that he or she is eligible for a tax refund for a specific amount. The bogus e-mail instructs the recipient to click on a link to access a refund claim form. The form requests personal information that the scammers can use to access the e-mail recipient’s bank or credit card account.

This notification is phony. The IRS does not send unsolicited e-mail about tax account matters to taxpayers.

Filing a tax return is the only way to apply for a tax refund; there is no separate application form. Taxpayers who wish to find out if they are due a refund from their last annual tax return filing may use the Where’s My Refund? interactive application on this Web site. IRS.gov is the only official IRS Web site.


Posted On: August 14, 2008

California Business Tax Audit - IRS Tax Audit and Tax Court Avoided By IRS' Tax Resolution Program

California Tax Attorney:

Internal Revenue Service IRS TAX announced that California businesses and associations have until Aug. 31 to submit tax issues to the Internal Revenue Service to be included in the Fall 2008 review in the Industry Issue Resolution (IIR) Program so that these issues could be resolved outside of IRS Tax Audit or the involvment of the United States Tax Court US TAX COURT. This program really does help address many common tax issues and may help California business owners avoid a full blown IRS tax audit which can be costly and time consuming to taxpayers.

IIR is an IRS IRS TAX program to resolve business tax issues common to significant numbers of taxpayers through new and improved guidance. In past years, issues submitted by associations and others representing both small and large business taxpayers, resulted in tax guidance that has affected thousands of taxpayers. california%20tax%20problem%20attorney%20offer%20in%20compromise.jpg>


Recent submissions accepted into the IIR by Internal Revenue Service IRS TAX program include:

Integrated Public Utilities - regarding an optional method to be used by integrated utility companies in computing their qualified production activities income under IRC section 199(c). Auto Last In First Out - for automobile wholesalers, manufacturers and dealers regarding the proper treatment of the dollar-value, LIFO inventory method for pooling purposes of crossover vehicles, which have characteristics of trucks and cars.


Recent guidance issued by Internal Revenue Service IRS TAX as a result of the IIR program includes:

A safe harbor pooling method, the Vehicle-Pool Method, is available for resellers of cars and light-duty trucks under the last-in, first out (LIFO) inventory method effective for tax years ending on or after December 31, 2007, (Revenue Procedure 2008-23) Valuation of Parts Inventory by Heavy Equipment Distributors (Revenue Procedure 2006-14) Clarification regarding circumstances when facsimile signatures may be used to sign employment tax forms. (Revenue Procedure 2005-39) Explanation of the circumstances under which insurance companies that make incentive payments to health care providers will be permitted to include those payments in unpaid losses. The revenue procedure also provides procedures under which taxpayers may obtain automatic consent of the Commissioner to change their accounting method for those payments. (Revenue Procedure 2004-41)

For each issue selected, an IIR team of Internal Revenue Service IRS TAX and Treasury personnel gather relevant facts from taxpayers or other interested parties affected by the issue. The goal is to recommend guidance to resolve the issue. This benefits both taxpayers and the IRS by saving time and expense that would otherwise be expended on resolving the issue through IRS Tax Audit. IIR project selections are based on the criteria set forth in Revenue Procedure 2003-36.


Posted On: August 13, 2008

IRS TAX RETURNS FOR CORPORATION AND PARTNERSHIPS REVISIONS AFFECT ASSET PROTECTION AND IRS PAYROLL TAX

Los Angeles Tax Attorney:

The Internal Revenue Service IRS TAX has released for public comment draft revisions to Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income, Form 1120, U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return, and certain related schedules. Included in the release are new Schedule B for Form 1120 and Schedule C for Form 1065. These forms will be for use for tax years ending on or after Dec. 31, 2008.

“The draft revisions and new forms will increase transparency about the ownership and relationships between entities that make up complex enterprise business structures,” said Frank Y. Ng, Commissioner of the Large and Mid-Size Business Division of IRS. “This will enable IRS to better assess compliance risk.”

For those attorneys who render asset protection services these changes may affect past and future asset protection strategies. "The major change to Form 1120 is to Schedule K and involves reporting direct and indirect ownership. When ownership meets certain percentage thresholds, it must be reported on Schedule K. Certain questions on Schedule K have been revised for this reporting."

The new Schedule B (Form 1120) is required of corporations that file Form 1120 Schedule M-3. Schedule B (Form 1120) will provide IRS information about allocations, transfers of interest, cost sharing arrangements, and changes in methods of accounting.

IRS%20TAX%20PROBLEMS.jpg>
The major changes to the Form 1065 also involve ownership issues. When ownership meets certain percentage thresholds, it must be reported on Schedule B (Form 1065). The revised Schedule B (Form 1065) will also be used to provide information about cancelled debt, and like-kind exchanges that the partnership may have participated in at any time during the tax year. For small partnerships, the asset threshold for filing Schedules L, M-1 and M-2 with Form 1065 has been increased from $600,000 to $1,000,000.

The new Schedule C (Form 1065) will be required of Form 1065 filers that file Schedule M-3. Schedule C (Form 1065) will be used to report information about related party transactions, allocations, transfers of interest, cost sharing arrangements and changes in methods of accounting.

New instructions for Item J of Schedule K-1 (Form 1065) clarify how partnerships determine partners’ percentage share in the profit, loss, and capital at beginning and end of the partnership’s tax year.

For information concerning IRS tax problems or tax matters contact us Tax Attorney:

Posted On: August 11, 2008

IRS TAX AUDIT: US TAX COURT DENIES EXPENSES CLAIMED FOR BUSINESS

Los Angeles Tax Attorney: Internal Revenue Service IRS Tax Audit case.

In a recent IRS Tax Court case, DOUGLAS K. AND GAYLE L. BARRETT, Petitioners v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent, July 21, 2008,
California taxpayers filed a US Tax Court US TAX COURT Complaint against the IRS for tax increases resulting from IRS Tax Audit. Taxes at issue are not for IRS payroll tax.

In the tax court, taxpayers claimed certain deductions including tools and automobiles used for the taxpayer's contractor business. However, IRS disallowed these deductions in the tax audit. IRS also charged an accuracy-related penalty-20 percent pursuant to IRS Tax Code section 6662(a).

IRS taxpayer did not provided any documentation to substantiate the cost of goods sold reported on their tax return. IRS tax auditor denied most of the business related expenses.

IRS%20TAX%20PROBLEMS.jpg> US Tax Courts have held that where taxpayers’ testimony is general, conclusory, or uncorroborated, the Court is not required to accept such testimony as sustaining taxpayers’ burden of proof. See Lerch v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1987-295, affd. 877 F.2d 624 (7th Cir. 1989); Geiger v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1969-159, affd. 440 F.2d 688 (9th Cir. 1971).

Tax Practice Note:
Taxpayers bear the burden of proving the Commissioner’s determinations are erroneous. Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).

IRC Section 162(a) allows deductions for ordinary and necessary expenses of carrying on a trade or business. Section 7491 regarding the burden of proof is not applicable in this case because petitioners have failed to meet the requirements of section 7491(a)(1) and (2).

IRS tax deductions are strictly a matter of legislative grace, and taxpayers bear the burden of proving they are entitled to any claimed deductions. INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79, 84 (1992).

Section 6001 requires taxpayers to maintain adequate books and records sufficient to substantiate all costs of goods sold and all deductions claimed on tax returns.

Section 274(d) requires taxpayers to substantiate any claimed deductions of listed property by adequate records or sufficient evidence and bars any deduction for an expenditure governed by section 274 on the basis of unsupported testimony of the taxpayers or on the basis of the taxpayers’ approximation.

IRS must prove penalty assessments under Section 6662(a) and (b)(1). This section imposes a 20-percent penalty on the portion of an underpayment attributable to negligence. Negligence includes any failure to keep adequate books and records or to substantiate items properly.

Sec. 1.6662-3(b)(1), Income Tax Regs. The Commissioner has the burden of production with respect to accuracy-related penalties. Sec. 7491(c). To meet that burden, the Commissioner must produce sufficient evidence indicating that it is appropriate to impose the penalty. See
Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438, 446 (2001). Once the Commissioner meets his burden of production, the taxpayer must come forward with persuasive evidence that the ommissioner’s
determination is incorrect. Rule 142(a); Higbee v. Commissioner, supra at 446-447.

The taxpayer may meet this burden by proving that he or she acted with reasonable cause and in good faith. See sec. 6664(c)(1); sec. 1.6664-4(a) and (b)(1), Income Tax Regs.

Posted On: August 10, 2008

LOS ANGELES IRS TAX AUDIT GUIDELINE FOR BUSINESS AUTO EXPENSE

Los Angeles Tax Attorney Internal Revenue Service IRS TAX today announced an increase in the optional standard mileage rates for the final six months of 2008. Taxpayers may use the optional standard rates to calculate the deductible costs of operating an automobile for business, charitable, medical or moving purposes.

The rate will increase to 58.5 cents a mile for all business miles driven from July 1, 2008, through Dec. 31, 2008. This is an increase of eight (8) cents from the 50.5 cent rate in effect for the first six months of 2008, as set forth in Internal Revenue Procedure 2007-70. IRS TAX AUDIT - Auto Expense Miles

IRS%20TAX%20AUDIT%20ATTORNEY%20CALIFORNIA.jpg

In recognition of recent gasoline price increases, the IRS made this special adjustment for the final months of 2008. The IRS normally updates the mileage rates once a year in the fall for the next calendar year.

"Rising gas prices are having a major impact on individual Americans. Given the increase in prices, the IRS is adjusting the standard mileage rates to better reflect the real cost of operating an automobile," said IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman. "We want the reimbursement rate to be fair to taxpayers."


While gasoline is a significant factor in the mileage figure, other items enter into the calculation of mileage rates, such as depreciation and insurance and other fixed and variable costs.

The optional business standard mileage rate is used to compute the deductible costs of operating an automobile for business use in lieu of tracking actual costs. This rate is also used as a benchmark by the federal government and many businesses to reimburse their employees for mileage.

The new six-month rate for computing deductible medical or moving expenses will also increase by eight (8) cents to 27 cents a mile, up from 19 cents for the first six months of 2008. The rate for providing services for charitable organizations is set by statute, not the IRS, and remains at 14 cents a mile.

IRS%20TAX%20AUDIT%20ATTORNEY%20NEW%20AUTO%20EXPENSE.jpgThe new rates are contained in Announcement 2008-63 on the optional standard mileage rates.

Taxpayers always have the option of calculating the actual costs of using their vehicle rather than using the standard mileage rates. IRS Mileage Expense for Tax Audit